Die Presse ist gar nicht so

Nachdem data-epi-spacing Jon data-epi-spacing Stewart data-epi-spacing unter data-epi-spacing anderem data-epi-spacing den data-epi-spacing Medien data-epi-spacing am data-epi-spacing Wochenende data-epi-spacing so data-epi-spacing phänomenal data-epi-spacing die data-epi-spacing Leviten data-epi-spacing gelesen data-epi-spacing hat, data-epi-spacing fühlen data-epi-spacing sich data-epi-spacing einige data-epi-spacing Medienvertreter data-epi-spacing zu data-epi-spacing Unrecht data-epi-spacing angegriffen.

So data-epi-spacing schreibt data-epi-spacing David data-epi-spacing Carr data-epi-spacing in data-epi-spacing der data-epi-spacing New data-epi-spacing York data-epi-spacing Times:

So data-epi-spacing instead data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing host data-epi-spacing of data-epi-spacing “The data-epi-spacing Daily data-epi-spacing Show” data-epi-spacing took data-epi-spacing steady data-epi-spacing aim data-epi-spacing on data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing one data-epi-spacing American data-epi-spacing institution data-epi-spacing that data-epi-spacing everyone data-epi-spacing can data-epi-spacing agree data-epi-spacing to data-epi-spacing hate: data-epi-spacing The data-epi-spacing Media. data-epi-spacing Within data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing first data-epi-spacing minute data-epi-spacing of data-epi-spacing his data-epi-spacing deft, data-epi-spacing very data-epi-spacing articulate data-epi-spacing stump data-epi-spacing speech data-epi-spacing at data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing end data-epi-spacing of data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing rally, data-epi-spacing Mr. data-epi-spacing Stewart data-epi-spacing turned data-epi-spacing his data-epi-spacing gun data-epi-spacing sights data-epi-spacing on data-epi-spacing the, data-epi-spacing um, data-epi-spacing fake data-epi-spacing news, data-epi-spacing which data-epi-spacing he data-epi-spacing called, data-epi-spacing “the data-epi-spacing country’s data-epi-spacing 24-hour data-epi-spacing political data-epi-spacing pundit data-epi-spacing perpetual data-epi-spacing panic data-epi-spacing conflictinator,” data-epi-spacing which, data-epi-spacing he data-epi-spacing added, data-epi-spacing “did data-epi-spacing not data-epi-spacing cause data-epi-spacing our data-epi-spacing problems, data-epi-spacing but data-epi-spacing its data-epi-spacing existence data-epi-spacing makes data-epi-spacing solving data-epi-spacing them data-epi-spacing that data-epi-spacing much data-epi-spacing harder.”

Dem data-epi-spacing mag data-epi-spacing sich data-epi-spacing Carr data-epi-spacing nicht data-epi-spacing ganz data-epi-spacing verschließen data-epi-spacing — data-epi-spacing er data-epi-spacing sieht data-epi-spacing die data-epi-spacing Prioritäten data-epi-spacing aber data-epi-spacing falsch data-epi-spacing gesetzt. data-epi-spacing Schließlich data-epi-spacing haben data-epi-spacing Medien data-epi-spacing doch data-epi-spacing nur data-epi-spacing einen data-epi-spacing so data-epi-spacing beschränkten data-epi-spacing Einfluss:

But data-epi-spacing here’s data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing problem: data-epi-spacing Most data-epi-spacing Americans data-epi-spacing don’t data-epi-spacing watch data-epi-spacing or data-epi-spacing pay data-epi-spacing attention data-epi-spacing to data-epi-spacing cable data-epi-spacing television. data-epi-spacing In data-epi-spacing even data-epi-spacing a data-epi-spacing good data-epi-spacing news data-epi-spacing night, data-epi-spacing about data-epi-spacing five data-epi-spacing million data-epi-spacing people data-epi-spacing take data-epi-spacing a data-epi-spacing seat data-epi-spacing on data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing cable data-epi-spacing wars, data-epi-spacing which data-epi-spacing is data-epi-spacing less data-epi-spacing than data-epi-spacing 2 data-epi-spacing percent data-epi-spacing of data-epi-spacing all data-epi-spacing Americans. data-epi-spacing People data-epi-spacing are data-epi-spacing scared data-epi-spacing of data-epi-spacing what data-epi-spacing they data-epi-spacing see data-epi-spacing in data-epi-spacing their data-epi-spacing pay data-epi-spacing envelopes data-epi-spacing and data-epi-spacing neighborhoods, data-epi-spacing not data-epi-spacing because data-epi-spacing of data-epi-spacing what data-epi-spacing Keith data-epi-spacing Olbermann data-epi-spacing said data-epi-spacing last data-epi-spacing night data-epi-spacing or data-epi-spacing how data-epi-spacing Bill data-epi-spacing O’Reilly data-epi-spacing came data-epi-spacing back data-epi-spacing at data-epi-spacing him. data-epi-spacing

Warum data-epi-spacing also data-epi-spacing hat data-epi-spacing Jon data-epi-spacing Stewart data-epi-spacing die data-epi-spacing Medien data-epi-spacing attackiert? data-epi-spacing Sie data-epi-spacing sind data-epi-spacing – data-epi-spacing so data-epi-spacing argumentiert data-epi-spacing Carr data-epi-spacing – data-epi-spacing willkommene data-epi-spacing Sündenböcke data-epi-spacing für data-epi-spacing eine data-epi-spacing Realität, data-epi-spacing die data-epi-spacing den data-epi-spacing Menschen data-epi-spacing nicht data-epi-spacing gefällt. data-epi-spacing In data-epi-spacing dem data-epi-spacing Jon data-epi-spacing Stewart data-epi-spacing die data-epi-spacing pundits data-epi-spacing beschimpfte, data-epi-spacing musste data-epi-spacing er data-epi-spacing nichts data-epi-spacing über data-epi-spacing Arbeitslosigkeit, data-epi-spacing Staatsschulden data-epi-spacing und data-epi-spacing Kriegen data-epi-spacing sagen. data-epi-spacing

His data-epi-spacing barrage data-epi-spacing against data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing news data-epi-spacing media data-epi-spacing Saturday data-epi-spacing stemmed data-epi-spacing from data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing fact data-epi-spacing that, data-epi-spacing on data-epi-spacing this data-epi-spacing day, data-epi-spacing attacking data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing message data-epi-spacing would data-epi-spacing have data-epi-spacing been data-epi-spacing bad data-epi-spacing manners, data-epi-spacing so data-epi-spacing he data-epi-spacing stuck data-epi-spacing with data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing messengers.

Ähnlich data-epi-spacing argumentiert data-epi-spacing Hamilton data-epi-spacing Nolan data-epi-spacing bei data-epi-spacing Gawker:

The data-epi-spacing media data-epi-spacing does data-epi-spacing not data-epi-spacing have data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing power data-epi-spacing to data-epi-spacing convince data-epi-spacing liberals data-epi-spacing or data-epi-spacing conservatives data-epi-spacing that data-epi-spacing their data-epi-spacing position data-epi-spacing is data-epi-spacing incorrect. data-epi-spacing The data-epi-spacing media data-epi-spacing does data-epi-spacing have data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing power data-epi-spacing to data-epi-spacing do data-epi-spacing this: data-epi-spacing draw data-epi-spacing a data-epi-spacing box, data-epi-spacing and data-epi-spacing say, data-epi-spacing „This data-epi-spacing box data-epi-spacing represents data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing boundaries data-epi-spacing of data-epi-spacing acceptable data-epi-spacing opinions.“ data-epi-spacing The data-epi-spacing boundaries data-epi-spacing of data-epi-spacing this data-epi-spacing box data-epi-spacing are data-epi-spacing arrived data-epi-spacing at data-epi-spacing by data-epi-spacing sampling data-epi-spacing a data-epi-spacing small data-epi-spacing range data-epi-spacing of data-epi-spacing politically data-epi-spacing acceptable data-epi-spacing pundits—say, data-epi-spacing from data-epi-spacing Arianna data-epi-spacing Huffington data-epi-spacing to data-epi-spacing Charles data-epi-spacing Krauthammer—and data-epi-spacing declaring data-epi-spacing them data-epi-spacing to data-epi-spacing represent data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing absolute data-epi-spacing extremes data-epi-spacing of data-epi-spacing rationality. data-epi-spacing Any data-epi-spacing opinions data-epi-spacing that data-epi-spacing fall data-epi-spacing outside data-epi-spacing of data-epi-spacing this data-epi-spacing box data-epi-spacing are data-epi-spacing dismissed data-epi-spacing as data-epi-spacing lunacy, data-epi-spacing and data-epi-spacing may data-epi-spacing be data-epi-spacing freely data-epi-spacing ignored.

Nicht data-epi-spacing Schreihälse data-epi-spacing wie data-epi-spacing Glenn data-epi-spacing Beck data-epi-spacing oder data-epi-spacing Keith data-epi-spacing Olbermann data-epi-spacing seien data-epi-spacing die data-epi-spacing Wurzel data-epi-spacing des data-epi-spacing Übels, data-epi-spacing sondern data-epi-spacing Journalisten, data-epi-spacing die data-epi-spacing Wischi-waschi-Standpunkte data-epi-spacing vertreten, data-epi-spacing um data-epi-spacing nicht data-epi-spacing aus data-epi-spacing dem data-epi-spacing Rahmen data-epi-spacing zu data-epi-spacing fallen. data-epi-spacing Der data-epi-spacing Konsens data-epi-spacing — data-epi-spacing wie data-epi-spacing auch data-epi-spacing anderswo data-epi-spacing — data-epi-spacing sei data-epi-spacing Gift. data-epi-spacing

Hier data-epi-spacing klicken, data-epi-spacing um data-epi-spacing den data-epi-spacing Inhalt data-epi-spacing von data-epi-spacing Twitter data-epi-spacing anzuzeigen.
Erfahre data-epi-spacing mehr data-epi-spacing in data-epi-spacing der data-epi-spacing Datenschutzerklärung data-epi-spacing von data-epi-spacing Twitter.

P.S.: data-epi-spacing Olbermann data-epi-spacing will data-epi-spacing nun data-epi-spacing zumindest data-epi-spacing nicht data-epi-spacing mehr data-epi-spacing regelmäßig data-epi-spacing die data-epi-spacing „worst data-epi-spacing persons data-epi-spacing of data-epi-spacing the data-epi-spacing world“ data-epi-spacing küren data-epi-spacing — data-epi-spacing und data-epi-spacing Jon data-epi-spacing Stewarts data-epi-spacing Rede data-epi-spacing wurde data-epi-spacing autotuned:

Hier klicken, um den Inhalt von www.youtube-nocookie.com anzuzeigen

Facts you deserve to know

Viel wird derzeit über Staatsgeheimnisse, vermeintliche Verschwörungen und deren Aufdeckung geredet. In diesem Zusammenhang hat John F. Kennedy kurz nach seinem Amtsantritt vor der American Newspaper Publishers Association eine interessante Rede gehalten.

The very word „secrecy“ is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

Edle Worte. Keine geheimniskrämerische Regierung, gegen den überbordenden Apparat der Geheimdienste! Doch es gibt da eine Ausnahme:

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country’s peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of „clear and present danger,“ the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public’s need for national security.

Today no war has been declared–and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of „clear and present danger,“ then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.

Frei übersetzt: Aber unsere Geheimnisse sind so wichtig, dass Journalisten sie stillschweigend akzeptieren sollten. Wer an unseren Geheimnissen rührt, rührt an der Sicherheit des Landes! Back off!

PS: Der historische Kontext ist auch spannend: Zehn Tage vor der Rede hatte Kennedy die Invasion der Schweinebucht befohlen, ein Angriff auf den kommunistischen Vorposten in Kuba. Um den Kriegsakt vorzubereiten, hatte der Geheimdienst CIA ein Jahr lang kubanische Exil-Kämpfer rekrutiert und ausgebildet.